Lab Report 5 : Balsam (Soil Moisture Analysis)
Lab Report 5 : Balsam (Soil Moisture Analysis)
Lecturer : Madam Diana
NAME
|
MATRIX NUMBER
|
ANGIE FAN YAN KAI
|
BS17110476
|
ELAVARASI A/P KASIRAJAN
|
BS17160663
|
NG JIT MUN
|
BS17160693
|
NIELSON EDWARD
|
BS17110462
|
NURUL HUDA BINTI IBRAHIM
|
BS17110437
|
UMI NAJUA BINTI ROSLAILY
|
BS17110319
|
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Soil moisture
is the main variable in earth system dynamics and is critical in hydropedologic
studies. When, where and how the water moves through various soils in different
landscapes and how water flow impacts soil formation processes and subsequent
soil moisture pattern. (Ying Zhao et al 2012) In this experiment, other than
soil moisture, we also vary the light exposure of five pots of plant. Light is
an essential factor in plant growth. The germination rate of plant remains
active is dependent on the amount of light it receives. The shoots and roots of
plants use multiple resources simultaneously. Plants in field are exposed to
vary the light exposure and soil moisture. Shoots need light for photosynthesis
and roots need water for cell expansion and transpiration. These two are the
most critical resources required by plants. (Kerstin A. et al, 2015) Besides, in
a forest, on the relative importance of light and soil moisture on
establishment of forest reproduction numerous and controversial investigations
related to this problem. The presence and absence of reproduction usually was
attributed to light. (G. E. Gatherum. 1963) Therefore, it shows light exposure
is not only related with soil moisture and also the ability of reproduction of
plants.
2.0
Objectives
1.
To
identify the soil moisture status for efficient irrigation.
2.
To
study the relationship between the light exposure and soil moisture in plants.
3.0 Materials and Method
3.1.1
Materials
·
Plant
soil
·
Portable
soil moisture tool
·
4 Carton Box
3.1.2 Method
1. Before the plant was watered, the moisture and
pH of the plant soil was checked using the portable soil moisture tool.
2. The tool was buried this inside the soil and
the moisture and pH were observed and recorded.
3. Then, the pots were covered as listed below.
Pot
A1 – No Cover
Pot
A2 – 2 Hours
Pot
A3 – 4 Hours
Pot
A4 – 6 Hours
Pot
A5 – 8 Hours
4. Lastly, once all the boxes are removed, the moisture
of soil was recorded again.
Table 4.1 : Results of Soil moisture content & Percentage of water
loss
Pots
|
Moisture Content
|
pH
|
% of water loss
|
||
Before
|
After
|
Before
|
After
|
||
A1
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
6.1
|
6.2
|
52.94
|
A2
|
1.7
|
3.3
|
6.4
|
6.4
|
48.48
|
A3
|
2.5
|
4.5
|
6.7
|
6.7
|
44.44
|
A4
|
4.0
|
6.3
|
6.6
|
6.6
|
36.51
|
A5
|
6.9
|
9.5
|
6.8
|
6.8
|
27.37
|
Table 4.1 shows the results of soil moisture content value and pH value by using
portable soil moisture sensor. Based on the table, the initial results showed
that before watering and covering up the plants, pot A1 has the lowest moisture
content (0.8) while pot A5 has the highest moisture content (6.9). The
conditions of the soil have probably been affected by the cover-up action
carried out for the past four weeks before this experiment. However, after
being watered and covered based on their respective hours (A1= 0hour, A2=
2hours, A3= 4hours, A4= 6hours, A5= 8hours), the soil moisture content of all
the pots showed an increased but with pot A1 still having the lowest moisture
content (1.7) and pot A5 still having the highest moisture content (9.5). On
top of that, comparing both the initial and final results, pot A5 has the
highest increase in its moisture content, with a total increase of 2.3 while
pot A1 has the lowest increase, with just a slight increase of 0.9 in its
moisture content. This is due to variation in size of the soil particles in
each pot. In normal condition, soil is able to trap large amount of water
between the soil particles which can be expressed as the soil moisture content.
The ability for a soil to retain water is partly determined by the size of the
soil's particles. The smaller the soil particles are, the more water the soil
can retains. Therefore, pot A5 probably contained more soil which are smaller
in sizes compared to the other pots despite all pots contained the same type of
soil which is sandy clay loam soil. Hence, more water is retained even though
all the plants were watered with the same amount of water.
Based on figure 4.1, it can be seen that
the percentage of water loss decreased from pot A1 to pot A5 with pot A1 having
the highest percentage of water loss which is a total of 52.94% and pot A5
having the lowest percentage of water loss with only 27.37%. The reason for pot
A5 to have the lowest percentage of water loss is mainly due to the low
transpiration rate because the pot was covered and left in the dark for 8
hours. In dark environment, the stomata are closed and CO2 levels
drop rapidly within the leaf, inhibiting the light-independent reactions which
then causes photosynthesis to stop. Hence, little amount of water was loss from
the soil in pot A5. This also explained why the soil moisture content in pot A5
is still the highest among the five pots even after the covered-up. On the
other hand, pot A1 had the highest percentage of water loss because the pot was
not cover by boxes. Hence its transpiration rate is very high and large amount
of water is evaporated from the leaves surface into the atmosphere at a
relatively fast rate. Besides, factors such as high temperature and air
movement also contributed to the high rate of transpiration of pot A1 as the
pot is exposed directly to sunlight and the environment.
According to the table 4.1, there
is no much difference in the pH of soil before and after watering the plant.
This is maybe due to buffering capacity. Buffering capacity is the ability of
the soil to resist change. By definition, the pH of a soil is the measurement
of the concentration of hydrogen ions in soil water. Usually, most plants do
best in soil that tests within the neutral range of 6.0 to 7.0. The pH of pure
water is related to the relative number of hydrogen and hydroxyl ions. If water
has a higher proportion of hydrogen ions, it is acidic and has a pH less than
7. Both the soil and the water contain negatively and positively charged ions
that influence the chemical composition and thus the pH of soil (SfGate, 2018).
5.0 Conclusion
As a conclusion, there are a lot of factors that affects the transpiration rate such as temperature and air movement which results in the change of soil moisture content.
References
1 G. E. Gatherum, A.L. McComb, W. E.
Loomis. 1963. Effects of Light and Soil Moisture on Forest Tree Seedling
Establishment. 777-792
2
Kerstin A. Nagel, David Bonnett, Robert
Furbank, Achim Walter. Ulrich Schurr, Michelle Watt. 2015. Simultaneous Effects
of Leaf Irradiance and Soil Moisture on Growth and Root System Architecture of
Novel Wheat Genotypes: Implications for Phenotyping. Journal of Experimental
Botany. 66:18. 5441-5452
3 Ornamental Production - Light, Temperature
and Humidity. Aggie Horticulture. Retrieved from https://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/ornamental/a-reference-guide-to-plant-care-handling-and-merchandising/light-temperature-and-humidity/
4 Ying Zhao, Jialiang Tang, Chris Graham,
Qing Zhu, Ken Takagi, Henry Lin. 2012. Hydropedology in the Ridge and Valley:
Soil Moisture Patterns and Preferential Flow Dynamics in Two Contrasting
Landscapes. Hydropedology. 381-411
Comments
Post a Comment